Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Health and Social Care / Fostering and Adoption

FURIOUS RESIDENTS FEAR FOR HOMES

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 February 2007
by Lee Peace
FURIOUS residents are to carry out their own survey of householders on the Windhill Estate amid claims that Doncaster Council's original consultation exercise misled people into backing widespread demolition.
People living on the estate dispute the legitimacy of the council's survey in which questionnaires were sent to 362 properties, all earmarked for re-development, asking householders their opinion about the future of the estate.
Following the consult
ation, the council said most residents who responded were in favour of demolition and re-building homes rather than simply refurbishing them.
But since the details came to light, residents claim the majority of them would actually prefer the estate to be spruced up through refurbishment instead of widespread demolition.
The council has now been accused of "bullying" residents during the process and there are claims that residents had been misled as to the potential outcome for their estate.
The Windhill Tenants and Residents Association is to conduct its own door-to-door survey and is planning to present the findings to the council.
The move by the TARA was supported by residents at their monthly meeting last Thursday. About 100 people crammed into the Batia community centre and voted overwhelmingly in support of carrying out the independent survey.
Resident Margaret Cook, of Windhill Avenue, said about 150 questionnaires have so far been filled in and only six voted in favour of demolition.
She added: "It is difficult to catch people in but we are hoping to get a response from every household included within the plan to show a true reflection of people's opinions.
"We will present our findings to either to the cabinet at Doncaster Council or to Mayor Martin Winter."
And Mexborough's ward councillors - Edwin Simpson, Sue Phillips and Malcolm Jevons - are also surveying householders across the estate.
Coun Simpson said: "Once we have our own results we have been told we can compare them street by street with the results which the council originally gathered in their consultation.
"There are some issues with confidentiallity so we cannot compare them individually but we can compare how different streets voted in the council survey and ours."
The controversial proposal that has caused such outrage is the £38 million masterplan under the Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder initiative - a government scheme to improve housing across the country.
In the council's consultation process residents were given a choice of three alternatives, with options A and B having an emphasis on refurbishing existing homes and partial demolition whereas option C involves extensive demolition of houses and re-building.
The council claims of the 362 households on the estate, 305 responded to questionnaires and 61 per cent of these voted in favour of Option C.
The masterplan boundary includes homes on Clayfield View, Pitt Street, 70-88 Cowper Road, Hirst Gate, Coniston Road, Windhill Crescent, Windhill Terrace and Windhill Avenue.
Doncaster Council's ruling cabinet agreed at a meeting in January to support the demolition option C, described as a "radical approach to renewal."
But only the first phase of work has been approved, and the council has promised more consultation before any more work starts.
Of the residents' survey, cabinet member Coun Chris Mills told the Times yesterday: "We would be interested to see what questions and methods are being employed by this survey. Our questionnaires were carried out face to face with individual households and residents were not pressured to give any particular answers. We stand by their results."
lee.peace@dearnetoday.co.uk



Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 01 February 2007 9:12 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Dearne
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.